Rosa Del Mar

Daily Brief

Issue 87 2026-03-28

Human-Factors-Founder-Chemistry-And-Organization-Design

Issue 87 Edition 2026-03-28 10 min read
General
Sources: 1 • Confidence: Medium • Updated: 2026-03-29 03:26

Key takeaways

  • The speaker asserted that the founding relationship is extremely important and suggested testing cofounder durability by checking for substantial prior shared history (for example living together or working through challenges), while also stating that even with diligence investors sometimes cannot know in advance whether founder chemistry will hold.
  • Harry Stebbings identified as an open watch item whether venture investing still works when early-stage entry prices reach roughly 100–150x ARR.
  • Gili Raanan stated that if sales and marketing spend yields about $0.10 of new ARR per $1 spent, growth can be engineered but is not sustainable, while product-market fit should produce meaningfully higher yield over time.
  • Gili Raanan predicted that current venture market dynamics and capital volume will lead to a serious catastrophe or shakeout for many participants.
  • Gili Raanan framed secondaries primarily as a talent-retention tool in extended private-company timelines and stated that Cyberstarts runs recurring annual employee tender offers via an employee liquidity fund.

Sections

Human-Factors-Founder-Chemistry-And-Organization-Design

  • The speaker asserted that the founding relationship is extremely important and suggested testing cofounder durability by checking for substantial prior shared history (for example living together or working through challenges), while also stating that even with diligence investors sometimes cannot know in advance whether founder chemistry will hold.
  • Gili Raanan stated that the biggest change in his view over the last 12 months is recognizing that chemistry with founders is more important than he previously believed.
  • Gili Raanan asserted that seed-stage investing involves severe uncertainty where investors know very little at entry and often evaluate unstable signals rather than durable fundamentals, which he uses to justify a greedier/self-interested posture on price and ownership.
  • The speaker stated that he passed on a founder who loudly praised himself in a first meeting, and that the company later became a public company.
  • Gili Raanan asserted that he concentrates his time and energy on supporting portfolio companies rather than ruminating on missed deals, and that investors cannot cover everything or expect to invest in every important AI or cybersecurity company.
  • Gili Raanan asserted that strong venture partnerships are built by letting partners play to their strengths rather than enforcing a uniform model, that focusing on fixing weaknesses tends to yield only market-average performance while doubling down on exceptional strengths creates advantage, and that imposing his own guardrails on others was net negative.

Cybersecurity-Seed-Pricing-Vs-Outcome-Base-Rates

  • Harry Stebbings identified as an open watch item whether venture investing still works when early-stage entry prices reach roughly 100–150x ARR.
  • Gili Raanan stated that seed entry valuations in cybersecurity have risen over time, giving examples of Adallom at a $15M post-money in 2012, Wiz at a $66M post-money in 2019, and current deals at $100–150M post-money.
  • Gili Raanan asserted that rising seed entry prices combined with low/unchanged success probabilities create a structural imbalance in cybersecurity venture and lead to wasted capital.
  • Whether larger potential outcome sizes (including those attributed to AI) materially change the seed-stage base-rate probability problem is unresolved in this corpus; Gili Raanan argued that they do not.
  • Gili Raanan stated that cybersecurity sees roughly 350–400 newly funded teams per year across the main geographies.
  • Gili Raanan stated that new cybersecurity unicorn creation was very low recently, asserting two new cyber unicorns in 2025 and one in 2024, with 2021 as an outlier year.

Operating-Metrics-And-Growth-Underwriting-Heuristics

  • Gili Raanan stated that if sales and marketing spend yields about $0.10 of new ARR per $1 spent, growth can be engineered but is not sustainable, while product-market fit should produce meaningfully higher yield over time.
  • Gili Raanan described Wiz's 2020 quarterly new business progression as $1M, then $2M, then $8M, then $24M.
  • Gili Raanan presented a benchmark for exceptional early-stage growth as annual new ARR scaling approximately 4x, 4x, 3x, 3x over the first five years (about 144x growth in annual new ARR by year five).
  • Gili Raanan asserted that high growth rate is the most important indicator of a healthy business and that once achieved it tends to persist as company DNA unless a major external shock intervenes.
  • Gili Raanan asserted that for early-stage cybersecurity startups, gross margins matter in principle but should not be a focus until much later because nearer-term problems take priority.
  • Gili Raanan asserted that a company can stall and then re-accelerate if founders diagnose issues and adjust, giving an example of two quarters of zero sales followed by $12M of new business over the next 12 months.

Venture-Returns-Concentration-And-Impending-Shakeout

  • Gili Raanan predicted that current venture market dynamics and capital volume will lead to a serious catastrophe or shakeout for many participants.
  • Gili Raanan asserted that venture as an asset class does not work for most participants because returns are highly concentrated among a small set of firms.
  • Gili Raanan asserted that venture performance has a feedback delay such that an investor often cannot know whether they are good for five or six years.
  • Gili Raanan asserted that an LP allocating evenly across venture managers should expect poor risk-adjusted outcomes in the current environment.

Liquidity-Management-Secondaries-And-Lp-Risk-Preferences

  • Gili Raanan framed secondaries primarily as a talent-retention tool in extended private-company timelines and stated that Cyberstarts runs recurring annual employee tender offers via an employee liquidity fund.
  • Gili Raanan stated that his LPs reacted overwhelmingly positively when he sold stock early in Cyberstarts' history, even though he later viewed the sale as a mistake in hindsight.
  • Gili Raanan reported that at least one LP told him they were not investing to hedge risk and preferred the fund take more risk.

Watchlist

  • Gili Raanan predicted that current venture market dynamics and capital volume will lead to a serious catastrophe or shakeout for many participants.
  • Harry Stebbings identified as an open watch item whether venture investing still works when early-stage entry prices reach roughly 100–150x ARR.

Unknowns

  • What are the actual distributions (median, quartiles) of seed-stage post-money valuations and ARR-multiple entry prices in cybersecurity and software broadly, and how have they changed by vintage?
  • Are success probabilities (e.g., reaching meaningful scale or unicorn status) in cybersecurity actually unchanged over time, or have they shifted with market and technology changes?
  • How should 'new cybersecurity unicorn' be defined and counted, and do independent datasets confirm the asserted recent counts?
  • To what extent do mega-funds actually maintain superior performance going forward, and what specific 'guardrails' correlate with outcomes?
  • How predictive is the proposed new-ARR growth benchmark across a broad sample (including failure cases), and under what conditions does it break?

Investor overlay

Read-throughs

  • If early stage entry pricing reaches roughly 100 to 150 times ARR without higher success probabilities, expected venture returns may compress, increasing the gap between top performers and the rest.
  • Growth that can be engineered at about $0.10 of new ARR per $1 of sales and marketing spend may indicate weak product market fit and higher long run churn or stalled scaling, pressuring later funding and outcomes.
  • A shakeout is possible if high capital volume and slow feedback cycles allow many participants to persist despite weak fundamentals, with later vintages showing more down rounds, fund underperformance, and consolidation.

What would confirm

  • Seed and early stage cohorts show rising post money valuations and higher ARR multiple entry prices while rates of reaching meaningful scale or unicorn outcomes do not improve.
  • Portfolio companies show improving sales and marketing efficiency over time without proportionate spend increases, consistent with product market fit rather than spend driven growth.
  • Increasing incidence of down rounds, flat rounds, fund write downs, or forced liquidity events consistent with a broad venture shakeout narrative.

What would kill

  • Even at high entry multiples, realized outcome sizes and success rates improve enough to sustain attractive return profiles across vintages.
  • Companies maintaining around $0.10 new ARR per $1 spent can still scale sustainably with strong retention and expanding efficiency over time.
  • Market dynamics remain stable with limited down rounds and no broad deterioration in fund outcomes, contradicting the shakeout expectation.

Sources